Activity Feed

### Crossing Elbrus from the North via Both Summits: Route Overview Detailed analysis of the route, including technical difficulties and required equipment for traversing Elbrus from the north, crossing both its Eastern and Western Summits.

ELBRUS EASTERN AND WESTERN PEAKS TRAVERSE VIA THE SOUTHERN SLOPE 3–4 cat. dif. From the village of Terskol, ascend via the road on the left bank of the Terskol River. The road almost immediately crosses to the left side of the southeastern spur of the Elbrus massif into the Azau gorge and gradually ascends to the "95" checkpoint, then to the "105" checkpoint and further to the ice base. The road serpentines can be bypassed via trails in many places, starting from the transformer booth near the village of Terskol. From the village of Terskol, 5–6 hours. From the ice base, descend from the moraine onto the glacier, then make a steep ascent. Continue upwards along the gentle snowy slope, gradually bearing left, moving in a broad snowy hollow until the slope steepness increases sharply (to 30–35°). Here, turn left and, ascending via a traverse onto a snowy rise, after 300–350 m, reach the rocky ridge where the Priyut 11 ( Refuge of Eleven) is located (to the left of the ascent path — hidden crevices). From the ice base, 1.5–2 hours. In summer, the path from the ice base to Priyut 11 is usually marked with wooden stakes every 40–60 m. Another ascent option to Priyut 11 is possible: from Terskol by car to Azau, then via the cable car and from the cable car station upwards along the broken rocks and snowfields — from the station, about 3–3.5 hours. At Priyut 11, it is advisable to have an active acclimatization day with an exit to the Pastukhov rocks.

0
0

Report on the team's ascent to the west summit of Elbrus via the western slope through Utug, describing the route and its technical characteristics.

Report

On the ascent to the summit of Elbrus West via the Western slope through Utyug for the category of complexity by the team of the "Maximum" Sports and Alpine Club of Pyatigorsk State University for the period from June 20 to 28, 2020.

I. Climbing Report Passport

General Information
1.1Full name, sports rank of the leaderSvitovoy Kirill Viktorovich, 1st sports rank
1.2Full name, sports rank of participantsFilatov Maxim Yuryevich, 2nd sports rank Mamonova Elena, 2nd sports rank
1.3Full name, sports rank of observerVikhlyaev Vladislav Valeryevich, 2nd sports rank
1.4Full name of coachDamianiди Ivan Georgievich, Grebenyuk Alexander Viktorovich
1.5OrganizationSAK "Maximum" PSU
0
0

Report on the first ascent of a category 3A route on the North-Eastern wall of peak Kavkaz West (4037 m) in February 2020.

Report

on the ascent to the summit of Pik Kavkaz Zapadny (4037 m) — first passage of the route via the North-Eastern wall, cat. diff. 3A by the team St. Petersburg-2 from February 2 to 3, 2020.

I. Ascent Report

1. General Information
1.1Full name, sports rank of the team leaderNikolayev Yuriy Aleksandrovich — 2nd sports rank
1.2Full name, sports rank of the participants1. Bogdanov Kirill Anatolyevich — 1st sports rank
2. Eliseev Sergey Gennadyevich — 2nd sports rank
1.3Full name of the coachErofeev Sergey Andreyevich — Candidate Master of Sports
1.4OrganizationAlpine club "Tekhnolog" (St. Petersburg team)
2. Characteristics of the ascent object
0
0

Report on the first ascent of a Category 3B route on the North face of Pik Kavkaz Centralny (4105 m) in August 2019 by a team from the Technolog Alpine Club.

Report

on the ascent to the summit of Pik Kavkaz Tsentralny (4105 m) - the first ascent of the route via the North slope, category 3B, by the team of alpine club "Tekhnolog" on August 2, 2019. Participants:

  • Barabashov A.A.
  • Shabelnikov S.V. St. Petersburg, 2020

I. Ascent Passport

1. General Information
1.1Full name, sports rank of the leaderBarabashov Anton Alekseevich, Master of Sports
0
0

Report on the first ascent to the summit Sovetsky Voyn via route 3A category of complexity on the North wall.

REPORT ON THE FIRST ASCENT TO THE SUMMIT OF Soviet VoIN PEAK VIA THE ROUTE OF 3A DIFFICULTY CATEGORY BY THE FRI-LINE TEAM FROM PYATIGORSK ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2023

I. Ascent Passport

1. General Information
1.1Full name, sports rank of the leaderKonstantinov G.A. 1st sports rank
1.2Full name, sports rank of the participantsPopov M.L. CMS, Semenova O.A. 1st sports rank
1.3Full name of the coachMotienko N.I. CMS
1.4OrganizationFri-line MAC
2. Characteristics of the Ascent Object
2.1RegionCaucasus, Kabardino-Balkaria
0
0

**Ascent of the Georgian Alpine Club team to the summit of Ai-Lama via the southern wall in 1963, route description, and technical difficulty of the climb.**

ASCENT ON AILAMA VIA THE SOUTH FACE

Report

of the combined team of climbers from the A. Japaridze Georgian Alpine Club, Tbilisi, 1965
THE AILAMA MASSIF FROM THE SOUTH.

Introduction

The Ailama massif stretches in a latitudinal direction. To the west, Ailama is adjacent to the peaks of Nuamkuam and the Bezengi Wall, separated from Ailama by a low, heavily dissected ridge with numerous gendarmes and deep gaps. The Main Caucasian Range runs south from Ailama to the peak of Tsurungal and further to the Ardon River gorge, where the Digor chain continues.

0
0

Description of the ascent route to the summit of Aidam (4537 m) via the southern counterfort and wall, including technical details and complexity categories.

Description of the Ascent Route to the Summit of AYILAMA via the South Face

The summit of AYILAMA (4537 m) is located in the MAIN CAUCASUS RANGE between the peaks of NUAM-KUAM (4283 m) to the west and TSURUNGAL (4342 m) to the east. The lower, base part of the summit is composed of heavily weathered schist rocks. The upper part rises as inaccessible vertical bastions made of light gray granite. The grandiose South Face of AYILAMA towers directly above the "AYILAMA" alpine camp. The path from the "AYILAMA" alpine camp goes along a trail on the right (orographic) bank of the Koruldashi River, then the trail crosses to the left (orographic) bank and proceeds along an old moraine overgrown with forest. This moraine leads to a small glacier, covered with snow and rocks, under the South Face of AYILAMA. To the left lies the icefall of the Koruldashi Glacier. In the lower part of the face, three counterforts are clearly visible, separated by couloirs.

0
0

Description of the ascent route to the summit with a detailed analysis of the complexity and tactics of passage.

Fig. 6.

0
0

Description of a combined route to the summit of Sandro Glavnaya from Sandro Zapadnaya, difficulty category 3B, traversing the Eastern and Northern ridges.

11. Sandro Zapadnaya — Sandro Glavnaya

(combined route, A. Naumova, category 3B, fig. 2, 4). From Sandro Zapadnaya (m. 8. descend easy broken rocks on the right side of the East ridge. I gendarme is bypassed on the right via simple broken rocks and ledges. Then follow easy rocks of the East ridge to the II gendarme, which is bypassed on the left via ledges. Then traverse via rocks on the left side of the long East ridge, crossing the ice and snow slope, to approach a narrow ice and snow couloir. Cross the couloir (protection), via a partially narrow ledge (piton) exit to an ice and snow couloir descending from the North ridge of Sandro Glavnaya peak. From the ledge ascend 20 m up on the right side of a steep ice and snow couloir (pitons).

0
0

Ascent of the north wall of Tetnuld peak in Caucasus via a new route rated 5B category of difficulty by a team from the instructors' school in 1982.

Passport

  1. Ice and snow ascent class.
  2. Central Caucasus, Southern lateral spur of the Main Caucasian Range.
  3. Peak Tetnuld, center of the North face.
  4. Proposed - 5B category of difficulty, first ascent.
  5. Elevation gain 1780 m, length 2190 m. Length of sections with 5–6 category of difficulty is 1768 m. Average steepness of main sections is 55° (R1–R2, R4–R14), including 6 category of difficulty 85–110° for 130 m (R12–R14).
  6. Pitons driven:
    • rock: 1
    • ice: 232
0
0
Showing 481–490 of 579 results