Report

on the ascent to the summit of Pik Kavkaz Tsentralny (4105 m) - the first ascent of the route via the North slope, category 3B, by the team of alpine club "Tekhnolog" on August 2, 2019.

Participants:

  • Barabashov A.A.
  • Shabelnikov S.V.

St. Petersburg, 2020

I. Ascent Passport

1. General Information
1.1Full name, sports rank of the leaderBarabashov Anton Alekseevich, Master of Sports
1.2Full name, sports rank of the participantsShabelnikov Sergey Vladimirovich, Candidate Master of Sports
1.3Full name of the coachBushmanov Yuri Dmitrievich, Master of Sports
1.4OrganizationAlpine club "Tekhnolog", St. Petersburg
2. Characteristics of the ascent object
2.1RegionCentral Caucasus
2.2ValleyAdyl-Su (Shkhelda)
2.3Section number according to the 2013 classification table2.4
2.4Name and height of the summitPik Kavkaz Tsentralny
2.5Geographical coordinates of the summit (latitude/longitude), GPS coordinates* (1)According to WGS: Lat. 43°10′07.741″ N, Long. 42°39′89.733″ E
3. Characteristics of the route
3.1Name of the routeVia the North slope
3.2Proposed category of difficulty3B
3.3Degree of route explorationFirst ascent
3.4Character of the route terrainIce and snow
3.5Height difference of the route (data from altimeter or GPS)1105 m
3.6Length of the route (in meters)1380 m
3.7Technical elements of the route (total length of sections of various difficulty categories with indication of terrain character: ice and snow, rock)Category 2 - 500 m - ice and snow; Category 3 - 650 m - ice and snow; Category 4 - 200 m - ice and snow; Category 4 - 30 m - rock
3.8Descent from the summitVia the ascent route - rock, ice and snow
3.9Additional characteristics of the routeThe route is recommended for ascents during: June-September
4. Characteristics of the team's actions
4.1Time of movement (team's walking hours, in hours and days)5 hours 50 minutes, 1 day
4.2Night haltsNone
4.3Departure for the routeAugust 2, 2019, 4:30
4.4Reach the summitAugust 2, 2019, 10:20
4.5Return to the base campAugust 2, 2019, 16:30
5. Responsible for the report
5.1Full name, e-mailBarabashov Anton Alekseevich, phone +7 905 265-20-80
  • (1) - filled in ONLY if the summit is not present in the Electronic Russian Classifier of mountain routes

II. Ascent Description

1. Characteristics of the Ascent Object

1.1. General Photo

img-0.jpeg

1 - Barabashov, 2019 - category 3B 2 - Romanov, 1956 - category 4A 3 - Naumov, 1954 - category 3B 4 - Distel, 1903 - category 3B 5 - Zhuravsky, 1955 - category 4A 6 - Nikolaev, 2020 - category 3A 7 - Aristov, 1935 - category 2B

Profile of the route to Pik Kavkaz (Ts) via the N slope

img-1.jpeg img-2.jpeg

Photo 2. Photopanorama of the ascent area and general photo of the summit of Pik Kavkaz. Approach to the start of the route, Δ - bivouac. Route taken by the team via the N slope of Pik Kavkaz (Ts). Bzhedukh via the N ridge, category 3B, Distel, 1903. img-3.jpeg

Photo 1. Map of the ascent area.

The dotted line shows the path to the route.

Geographical location of the area

The object of the ascent - Pik Kavkaz Tsentralny (Glavny, 4105 m) - is located in the northwestern spur of the Main Caucasian Range, branching off from the summit of Kavkaz Vostochny (4163 m).

The spur of Pik Kavkaz has 5 summits:

  • Kavkaz Vostochny - 4163 m (on the Main Caucasian Range crest)
  • Kavkaz 2nd Vostochny
  • Kavkaz Glavny (Tsentralny) - 4105 m
  • Kavkaz Zapadny - 4037 m
  • Kavkaz Yugo-Zapadny - 3578 m

The first ascent of the Eastern summit was made by D. Kokkini in 1888.

As of 2021, the following routes have been traversed:

  • Kavkaz Vostochny via the SW ridge - category 2A (H. Tomashek, 1929)
  • Kavkaz Zapadny via the NW ridge - category 2B (O. Aristov, 1935)
  • Kavkaz Gl (Ts) via the SE spur - category 4A (A. Chorap, 1980)
  • Kavkaz Gl (Ts) via the N slope - category 3B (A. Barabashov, 2019)
  • Kavkaz Zapadny via the NE wall - category 3A (Yu. Nikolaev, 2020)

The approach to all the summits of the spur goes from the valley of the Shkhelda river, which is a left-bank tributary of the Adyl-Su river. The starting point is the settlement of Elbrus. Further, bypassing the Adyl-Su alpine camp, at the confluence of the Baksan and Adyl-Su rivers, ascend to the Shkhelda alpine camp.

img-4.jpeg

Photo 3. Technical photo of the route.

2.2. Technical characteristics of the route sections

Section №Character of reliefCategory of difficultyLength, mType and number of anchors
From the night halts on the moraine descend to the base of the upper rock belt on the Bzhedukh glacier. Here is the start of the route.
R0-R1Ascent along the ice slope along the upper rock belt. The glacier is partially broken2300 m, 20°-25°Simultaneous movement in rope teams, with crampons
R1-R2Ice-firn slope. Key section2-3250 m, 30°-35°Simultaneous movement in rope teams, with crampons. Belay via ice screws
R2-R3Steep ice pitch450 m, 50°-60°Rope teams, crampons, belay via ice screws, ice axe required
R4-R5Steep firn slope with a bergschrund4150 m, 45°-50°Rope teams, crampons, ice screws, ice axe
R5-R6Gentle sharp ice-firn ridge2100 m, 10°-15°Rope teams, crampons, ice screws
R6-R7Steep rock pitch leading to the summit tower. Rocks are icy430 m, 60°Rope teams, crampons, rock protection

Descent. Descent via the ascent route.

Route diagram in UIAA symbols

img-5.jpeg

3. Characteristics of the team's actions

Excerpt from the debriefing protocol

of the participants of the training camp of the St. Petersburg FA (alpine club "Tekhnolog") on Pik Kavkaz Glavny (Tsentralny) via the North slope (first ascent) category 3B, August 2, 2019.

Debriefing conducted by senior coach Bushmanov Yu.D.

Presented: Barabashov A.A. (team leader)

The object of the ascent was recommended to us by the training department of the Shkhelda alpine camp and was studied visually during a reconnaissance sortie. Considering the good form of the participants and high sports qualification, a tactical plan for a speed ascent in 1 day was drawn up. Since the route is mostly snow and ice, modern ice equipment was selected. Rocks are encountered only on the summit tower. The time to reach the summit took about 6 hours, the descent took just as long and followed the ascent route.

The route was traversed without stops, with simultaneous movement in a rope team. The leaders alternated as the reserve of anchors was depleted.

I have no complaints about my partner. Communication with the base was stable. In terms of technical complexity and length, the route corresponds to category 3B, similar to the best snow and ice routes in the Bezengi valley. For training groups, the ascent time will take 10-12 hours.

Shabelnikov S.V.

I've been climbing with my partner for a long time. On the route, there was complete mutual understanding.

Conclusion:

Bushmanov Yu.D.

The leaders of the training camp and the St. Petersburg team chose and traversed a beautiful route. Very quickly. The route corresponds to category 3B.

The ascent and leadership are to be counted. Compile a report and submit for classification.

Debriefing conducted by:

  • Senior coach: Bushmanov Yu.D.
  • Secretary: Nikolaev Yu.A.

img-6.jpeg

At the end of section R1-R2 img-7.jpeg

Overcoming the ice pitch R2-R3 img-8.jpeg

At the start of section R3-R4 img-9.jpeg

At the end of section R3-R4 img-10.jpeg

Section R4-R5 on descent img-11.jpeg

Photo from the summit img-12.jpeg

Photo from the summit

Sources

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment