Activity Feed
Route Description: 3 гребню
Route description to the summit of Nazepo, third overnight stay, with photographs and key information on the passage of the path.
Назепо — bivouac — 3
vak
becomes
Nazepo — bivouac — 3
vak
Route Description: СВ кф. В гребня
Description of the first ascent of peak "5090" (Adimireteev) via the North-Eastern spur of the Eastern ridge, category 5B difficulty.
I. Technical class. 2. Pamir-Alai, Turkestan Range, Ak-su gorge. 3. Peak "5090" (Adimireteev) via the North-Eastern buttress of the Eastern ridge. 4. Proposed — 5B category of difficulty, first ascent ¹). 5. Elevation gain — 790 m, length — 976 m. Length of sections with 5–6 category of difficulty — 361 m, including 65 m of 6 category. Average steepness of the route — 55°. Average steepness of the main section of the route (4500–4990) — 59. 6. Pitons driven ²): rock 89 16 chocks 36 3 ice 34 0
Route Description: С стене
A technical ascent description of 6A category complexity to the summit of Ak-Su (N.) via the north wall, following L. Troshchinenko's route in the Pamir-Alay range.
Ascent Passport
- Ascent category — technical
- Ascent area: Pamiro-Alai, Turkestan Ridge, Lyaylyak gorge.
- Peak, route: p. Aksu (N) via N wall (L. Troshchinenko route).
- Category of difficulty — 6A
- Height difference: — 1640 m — of which the wall part proper — 1100 m — total route length — 2149 m — length of the wall part — 1384 m
Route Description: зеркалу 3 стены
Ascent to Peak 4810 along the center of the NW face of the Turkestan Range, category 6B, technically challenging ascent with an altitude difference of 1160 m.
Ascent Passport
- Ascent class - technical
- Ascent area - Pamir-Alai, Turkestan Range
- Peak 4810 - via the center of the NW wall (A. Rusyaeva) KTM 5.4.3.II.
- Complexity category - 6B
- Height difference - 1160 m, including: wall - 885 m, length - 1730 m length of sections with 5-6 complexity category - 1410 m, including 6 category - 1330 m (3650-4535). Steepness of the wall section - 74°
- Pitons driven: Rock placements, bolted 123/21 267/29 25/7
- Team's travel hours - 61 and 6 days
Route Description: траверс
A description of the ascent route to the summit, including technical information and preparation details for a challenging alpine climb.
1. 1
1.1
Route Description: Ход конем
Descriptions of routes to the top of Zamok in Crimea, including challenging climbing routes and their characteristics.
Castle
The Castle peak (650 m) rises several meters from the upper (old) road Yalta — Sevastopol near the village of Foros. To the left of the Castle is the Mshatka-Kaya mountain, and to the right is Maly Kilse-Burun. The most interesting routes on the Castle pass along the southern wall — these are the routes:
- 6A
- 5B This is 8 ropes of the wall section, not counting the "roof". The length of the routes is about 400 m. On the more gentle southeastern wall, there are several relatively simple routes:
- 1B
- 3B The southern wall of the Castle looms over the upper (old) road, which connected Sevastopol and Yalta for over 100 years. The steep wall with a smooth, mossy, and in some places overhanging lower part; a more gentle but crumbling upper part and several caves overgrown with ivy in the center — it inspires awe and trepidation. Three very complex routes have been laid out along it, serving as benchmarks for the highest level of climbing mastery:
- Route 1
- Route 2
Route Description: Ю ребру
Description of the ascent route to the summit with a detailed analysis of tactics and technical features.
Fig. 15.
Route Description: центр. ребру 3 стены
Route to the summit via the northwest wall, category 5B difficulty, with a detailed description of the path and technical details.
Peak Uk
South face
Route Description: кулуару и СЗ гребню
Description of the ascent route to a nameless dome in the Altai Mountains with photos from the personal archive of the trip participant.
Fig. 2
View of the dome from top to bottom, August 2013
Route Description: ЮЗ гребню
A description of the ascent route to the summit with a detailed scheme of approaches and technical details.
Fig. 17