1. Nature of the Ascent

1.1. Class of ascent — rock climbing. 1.2. Area of ascent — Western Caucasus, Nakhar region. 1.3. Peak — B. Nakhar, 3780 m, northwest wall (B. Koralin route). 1.4. Category of complexity — 6B. 1.5. Number of pitons driven: 1) for belaying — 23; 2) for creating artificial climbing holds (ITCH) — 5; 3) rock pitons — 23; 4) ice pitons — 0; 5) bolt pitons — 1. 1.6. Height difference — 1000 m. Length of sections — 712 m. Average steepness — 80°. 1.7. Number of climbing hours — 37 hours. 1.8. Number of overnight stays — 2. Including — 1 sitting bivouac. 1.9. Group composition: 1) Dorokhov B.F. — leader, Candidate for Master of Sports; 2) Pronin A.V. — participant, Candidate for Master of Sports; 3) Malamid V.M. — participant, Candidate for Master of Sports; 4) Rumyantseva N.A. — participant, Candidate for Master of Sports. 1.10. Team coach — Zakharov P.P. 1.11. Departure date — August 9, 1982. Return date — August 11, 1982.

Table

of the main characteristics of the ascent route. Ascent route — Peak Bolshoy Nakhar via the northwest wall, 6B category of complexity, Koralin B.N. route, height 3780 m.

Height difference of the route — 1000 m. Including complex sections — 785 m. Average steepness of the route — 80°. img-0.jpeg img-1.jpeg

1

img-3.jpegimg-4.jpeg

DateSectionSteepnessLengthNature of terrainDifficulty (category of complexity of sections)ConditionWeather conditionsRock pitonsIce pitonsBolt pitonsNotes
09.08.R0–R150°60 mSnow-ice slope at the end of the rantkluftFrom 10 am, ice and stones possible from the wallgood
R1–R265°50 mWall4Live stones on the shelves, stones and ice from the wall and roofsame10Including 3 chocks.
R2–R365°50 mWall3Same10
R3–R490°50 mWall with overhanging sections6Monolith15
R4–R560°30 mInner corner4Rocks are solid5
R5–R620°15 mShelf3Same3
R6–R790°15 mWall5Monolith5
R7–R825 mHorizontal, narrow shelf4Shelf is covered with ice6Including 2 ledges, a sitting bivouac is possible
R8–R980°10 mWall5Rocks are solidGood3
R9–R1020 mHorizontal, narrow shelf4Samesame5Including 2 chocks
R10–R1190°7 mInner corner, traverse to the right side6Monolith, icy rocks21
R11–R1290°25 mInner corner with overhanging sections6Rocks are solid10Including 2 chocks
R12–R1370°10 mInclined slab4Rocks are solid2
R13–R1495°15 mInner corner6Rocks are like feathers, some are live4All chocks
R14–R1580°15 mWall5Monolith3
R15–R1670°55 mInclined slabs5Monolith, rocks are covered with ice16A convenient bivouac is possible on the right under the base of the wall
R16–R1770°50 mSystem of inclined shelves5Rocks are solid, covered with water14
R17–R1890°15 mWall5Rocks are solidgood4
R18–R1990°25 mInner corner5Rocks are destroyedsame7
R19–R2070°30 mInclined slab4Rocks are solid, ice and stones possible from the roof8Including 4 chocks, an inconvenient bivouac (sitting)
10.08.R20–R2195°80 mWallA3Monolith, ice and stones possible from the roof1030
R21–R2280°50 mWall with overhanging sections5Rocks are solidgood152 chocks
R22–R2380°100 mWall, with inner corner, wall5Rocks are heavily destroyedgood244 chocks
R23–R2470°150 mWall5Rocks are icyGraupel, wind28At the end of the rope, under the base of the rock counterfort, a bivouac is possible
R24–R2560°10 mSnow-ice slope with rock islands (traverse to the right upwards)4Snow is sour, ice under the snow, piton belay through rocksgraupel, snow, wind23Exit at the end to the ridge leading to the summit, convenient bivouac
11.08.R25–R2660°200 mRidge2Snow-covered rocksGoodAlong the ridge, exit to the summit.

3. Explanations for the Characteristics Table

3.1. Most complex sections of the route:

  • inner corner (sections R10–R11 and R11–R12), passage of which is technically complex (smoothed wet rocks, water in the form of rain) — a vertical monolithic wall with overhanging sections, mainly using artificial climbing holds (ITCH).

3.2. The route is generally safe. However, one should consider the possibility of avalanches from the "roof," which may partially affect sections R20–R21 and the lower part of the route. Avalanches occur:

  • during bad weather;
  • when the weather changes in the morning hours.

At the beginning of the route, one should be cautious of avalanches or snow collapses from the slope marked * (the group observed a snow slope collapse, and the route was partially affected by the collapsed slope).

3.3. The route is distinguished by its logic, steepness, and technical complexity of individual sections.

3.4. A group of 4 people should have at least 2 ice axes.

4. Descent Recommendations

4.1. Descent from the summit to the site of the 2nd bivouac and further along the ridge for about 200 m, then left into a wide rocky cirque and further left down the cirque (complexity not higher than category 2) — 1–1.5 hours. Stick to its left edge as you descend.

The main landmark on the descent: the group should see the saddle to the right and the lake in the valley simultaneously or only the saddle. If the group sees only the lake in the valley, it is a sure sign that they are descending via the wrong cirque (there are 2 cirques on the descent). If the group still ends up in the wrong cirque, they should climb out onto the ridge to the right.

After 1.5 hours of descent along the cirque and exiting onto a flattening rocky slope, one should find a descent from the cirque to the left onto a rocky counterfort and along it onto the talus slopes (at the end — 20 m rappel through a ledge) and further onto the saddle.

5. Route Diagram in UIAA Symbols

img-5.jpeg V. B. Nakhar 200 m, 0° BIVOUAC 2 100 m, 60°, 4 150 m, 70°, 1 100 m, 80° 50 m, 80° 80 m, 95°, A3 BIVOUAC 1 30 m, 70°, 4 25 m, 90° 15 m, 90° 50 m, 70°, 5 15 m, 80°, 1 14 m, 95°, 6 10 m, 78°, 5 25 m, 90°, 6 7 m, 80°, 1 20 m, –, 4 10 m, 0°, 5 25 m, –, 5 14 m, 95°, 5 15 m, 20°, 1 30 m, 60°, 4 50 m, 90°, 6 50 m, 5° 50 m, 65°, 4 60 m, 50°

Footnotes

  1. img-2.jpeg

Attached files

Sources

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment